Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ß¾äÉ ñéï·öÍÊà ïáñé×îËÒ¿¡ μÇÑ ÷ÖͪùÊîÜ æÚϼ

The Statistical Study Of Maxillary Median Diastema

´ëÇѼҾÆÄ¡°úÇÐȸÁö 1983³â 10±Ç 1È£ p.115 ~ 122
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
À̼ºÁÖ(×Ýàõñ²)/Sung Joo Lee

Abstract

Ì¿Öå
ÎÃñ¶ã¼Ò® 'N' ÏÐÚÅùÊÎèÀÇ Ø» 7ᨺÎÅÍ 12ᨠä®ÔÛ 2,082Ù£(Ñû: 1,078Ù£, åü: 1,004Ù£)À» Ϣ˷Ëþ
ÞÛÇÑ ý­ 1mmì¤ß¾ÀÇ ß¾äÉ ñéï·öÍÊà ïáñé×îËÒ¸¦ °®´Â ä®ÔÛ 304Ù£(Ñû: 176Ù£, åü: 138)À» æÚϼ
ÇÑ Ì¿Íý ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº Ì¿ÒÕÀ» ¾ò¾ú´Ù.
1. ïáñé×îËÒ Û¡ßæ×ËÀº 14.6%·Î¼­ Ñûí­°¡ åüí­º¸´Ù ³ô¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, Ñû, åü ÍìÈ÷ 8ᨿ¡¼­ õÌÍÔ×ËÀ»
º¸¿´´Ù.
2. ïáñé×îËÒ´Â Ò´ÖÆñòÊ¥¿¡ µû¶ó Êõá´ÇÏ´Â ÌËú¾À» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù.
3. ÏÑá¶îÜ ê«ì×ÀÌ ¾ø´Â ïáñé×îËÒ´Â ß¾âîá³ÓáÀÇ Ëå×î¿¡ ÀÖ¾î ß¾äÉ çµÎùñéï·öÍ°¡ ØðõóÇÑ ì¤ý­
¿¡´Â ó¬×並 ³ªÅ¸³»Áö ¾Ê¾ÒÀ¸¸ç, ïáñé×îËÒÓø´Âß¾äÉ çµÎùö°ï·öÍ°¡ ØðõóÇÔ¿¡ µû¶ó Êõá´ÇÏ´Â
ÌËú¾À» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù.
4. ÏÑá¶îÜ ê«ì×À» °®´Â ïáñé×îËÒÀÇ Û¡ßæ×ËÀº37.8%¿´À¸¸ç Ò´ÖÆÀÌ ñòÊ¥ÇÒ¼ö·Ï ³ô¾Ò´Ù.
5. ïáñé×îËÒ ê«ì×ܬ Û¡ßæÞºÓø´Â ´ÙÀ½°ú °°´Ù.
ß¾äÉîñöÍÀÇ üÞï® ; 12.2%, Φí¥öÍ : 10.9%, ÞªïáßÈ ß¾âîá³Óá ; 9.5%,
peg lateralis : 7.2%, ËÒÎáñø ; 2.6%, öÍÊàöÍðËÍé û¡÷¾×äßÈ ; 2.6%,
ö°ï·öÍÌÀáß ; 0.7%, ß¾,ù»äÉÊà öÍä³Å©±âÀÇ ÝÕðàûú : 0.3%.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The author surveyed 2,082 schoolchildren (Male:1,078, Female:1,004) from 7 to 12 years
old in 'N' primary school in kwang Ju City, and studied on )04 schoolchildren (Male:
176, Female: 128) having maxillary median diastema. The results were as follows:
1. The prevalence of maxillary median diastema was 14.675, and it showed the greater
rate at the boys than at the girls and the highest rate at 8 years old in the both sexes.
2. The maxillary median diastema showed decreasing tendency with ageing.
3. The frenum distance in children without local factors showed no change and the
divergent degree of maxillary median diastema showed decreasing tendency after the
eruption of maxillary lateral incisors.
4. The rate of maxillary median diastema associated with local factors was 37.8% and it
showed increasing tendency with ageing.
5. The prevalence of median diastema according to etiology was as follows;
rotated tooth ; 12,2%, supernumerary teeth ; 10.9%, abnormal frenum ; 9.5%,
peg lateralis ; 7.2%, open bite ; 2.6%, abnormal pattern of interseptal alveolar bone;
2.6%, missing lateral incisor : 0.7%, tooth size discrepancy ; 0.3%.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI